AUPO
ASSOCIATION OF UPSC RECRUITED PROGRAMME OFFICERS OF ALL INDIA RADIO & DOORDARSHAN. REGISTRATION NO:-37685/2000 E-MAIL:- aupoindia2012@gmail.com
Sunday, November 13, 2016
Thursday, September 12, 2013
Legal Notice
Amiy Shukla
Advocate
c/o
Human Rights Law Network
576, Masjid Road ,
Jungpura
Tel: 24379857 email: amiy2906@gmail.com
11.09.2013
To,
1.
Prof.
D.P.Agrawal,
Chairman
,
Union
Public Service Commission,
Dholpur
House,
2.
Dr.
Syamal Kumar Sarkar,
Secretary
,
Department
of Personnel & Training,
North
Block,
3.
Shri
Bimal Julka,
Secretary
,
Ministry
of Information & Broadcasting
Shastri
Bhavan
Sub: In the Supreme Court of India, Civil Appeal 4387 of 2007 in the matter
of Association of UPSC Recruited
Programme Officers of AIR and DD Vs Union of India & Others.
Sirs,
I
write this letter in response to the letters written by Secretary, Ministry
of Information & Broadcasting
to you and other persons seeking to pressurise UPSC and DOP&;T to
revise the stand taken by UPSC and DOP&T as found in Secretary UPSC
Shri A. Bhattacharya’s affidavits dated 22nd March 2012 ,
the DOP&T advisory to the UPSC dated 6th March 2012 and the subsequent communication of UPSC
to the Ministry of I&B dated
20th March 2013 filed
before the Principal Bench of CAT, New Delhi in C.P. No. 217/2005 in O.A.No.399/2001.
In
this regard my colleague Adv Svetlana Correya had addressed a letter to you
dated 06.05.2013 bringing to your attention that the application filed in the
Supreme Court by the All India Radio and Doordarshan Programme Professional
Association on behalf of the staff artists, seeking to challenge the stand of
the UPSC and DOPT as stated in the abovementioned affidavits, was dismissed by
the Supreme Court as recent as 18.04.13. The legal notice dated 6.05.13
together with the order of the Supreme Court dated 18.04.13 is annexed with
this letter for your convenience.
Though
fully aware that the staff artists had failed to convince the Supreme
Court that the stand of the UPSC and
DOP&T as stated in the above mentioned affidavits/communications was wrong ,
the Secretary I&B is now
seeking to pressurise UPSC and
DOP&T to revise their stand in accordance with the above mentioned
application made by the erstwhile contractual staff artists in the Supreme
Court , which was dismissed. The Secretary I &B is attempting to interfere
with the Court proceedings even though he knows that the matter is fixed for
final hearing in the Supreme Court and is showing on the cause list. There is
thus deliberate and willful interference with the course of justice.
In
fact, in a companion matter being Union of India Vs Satish Chandra Mathur
(Civil Appeal No. 12801 of 1996 dated 1.5.2001), the Supreme Court has already
decided a matter similar to the present civil appeal No.4387/2007. Copy of the
decision of the Apex Court
is annexed with this letter , wherein the Supreme Court has upheld the
principle of Screening by UPSC for
appointment/induction in the grade of Programme Executive , as provided in the
statutory rules (Rule 4A of the All India Radio Group B Posts Recruitment(Amendment)
Rules of 23.10.1984). You will notice that the stand taken in the affidavits of
UPSC and DOPT above mentioned are in consonance with this Supreme Court
decision. The Secretary, I&B would have you act contrary to this Supreme
Court Judgment.
The
pressurising attempts of the Secretary I&B and his persistence in acting
contrary to law will be brought to the notice of the Supreme Court when the
matter is finally argued shortly. The Chairperson , UPSC and the Secretary, DOPT are requested not to succumb to his
pressure and to act in accordance with their
above mentioned affidavits filed before the Hon’ble CAT Delhi, against
which applications were filed in the Supreme Court supported by I&B’s
stance in the matter and this
application has been dismissed. There is therefore no impediment to UPSC and
DOP& T acting strictly in accordance with the affidavits dated 19.1.2012,
Secretary UPSC’s affidavit dated 22.3.2012 with the DOP&T advisory to UPSC
dated 6.3.2012 and UPSC Communication dated 20.3.2013 above mentioned. Secretary UPSC’s affidavit
dated 22.3.2012 incorporating the DOP&T advisory to UPSC dated 6.3.2012 and
UPSC Communication dated 20.3.2013 are
annexed hereto.
Sincerely
Amiy Shukla
Encl: A/a
Tuesday, April 23, 2013
Prayers of staff artists dismissed as devoid of merit by Supreme Court and related Supreme Court Order
The Specific Prayers of the Staff artists in their I.A's 5 & 10 (interim applications) in Civil Appeal 4387/2007 (AUPO Case)which were collectively dismissed as devoid of merit by the Supreme Court on 18.4.2013 are reproduced below:-
PRAYER in first I.A. No.5 (dated 27th March 2012) filed by the Staff Artists
a) Pass an order/direction directing Respondent No.4 UPSC not to act or convene a DPC based on its affidavit dated 19.1.2012 filed before CAT , New Delhi in C.P.No.217 of 2005 in O.A.No. 399/2001 and on the basis of letter dated 06.03.2012 sent by DOP&T to UPSC in so far as it may involve reopening the regularization and relevant seniority of staff artists and such promotions which have been duly affected by the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
b) Pass such order or further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
PRAYER in second I.A. No.10 (dated 10th April 2013) filed by the Staff Artists
a) Pass an order/direction directing Respondent No.4 UPSC not to act or convene a DPC based on its letter dated 20.03.2013 sent to the Ministry of I&B in so far as it may involve reopening the date of regularisation and relevant seniority of staff artists and such promotions which are in tune and in terms of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
b) Pass such order or further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
SUPREME COURT ORDER DISMISSING BOTH APPEALS MADE BY STAFF ARTISTS IN I.A. No. 5 and I.A. No 10 IS REPRODUCED BELOW:-
ITEM NO.49 COURT
NO.8 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F
I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IAS 5 & 10/2013 in CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4387 OF 2007
ASSN.OF UPSC RECRUITED PROG. OFFICER ETC Appellant (s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for directions and office report )
Date: 18/04/2013 This Appeal was
called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
For Appellant(s) Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Sevtlana C. Adv.
Mr. Juno Rahman, Adv.
Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Varuna Bhandari, Adv.
Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Adv.
Mr. D.S. Mahra ,Adv
Mr. R. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Charudatta Mahindrakar, Adv.
Mr. Shodhan Babu, Adv.
Ms. Neelam Singh, Adv.
Ms. Supriya Garg, Adv.
Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee,Adv.
Mr. Bharat Sangal ,Adv
Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj ,Adv
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Delay condoned.
Heard.
This application has no merit and
is dismissed with
the
observation that any order passed by the UPSC shall remain, subject
to the ultimate outcome of this appeal, pending in this Court.
| (GEETA AHUJA) |(VEENA KHERA) |
| Sr. P.A. | Court Master |
Explanatory Note:
1. Note that the Staff artists Prayer to
prevent UPSC from acting on
its letter of 20.3.2013 has been dismissed as without merit. (This
means that the UPSC can act on its letter of 20.3.2013) . Please see scanned copy of UPSC
letter on the blog.
2. The Supreme Court order dismissing the staff artists prayer also reaffirms that "any order passed by UPSC shall remain"....
Thus the Supreme Court has declared that not only the UPSC letter dated 20.3.2013 which the staff artists had prayed to quash (posted on the blog) is upheld , but any previous clarifications/order made by UPSC, such as UPSC Secretary's affidavit with DOPT advisory etc also remains (i.e is upheld/ to be followed ).
Thus the Supreme Court has declared that not only the UPSC letter dated 20.3.2013 which the staff artists had prayed to quash (posted on the blog) is upheld , but any previous clarifications/order made by UPSC, such as UPSC Secretary's affidavit with DOPT advisory etc also remains (i.e is upheld/ to be followed ).
3. subject to the ultimate outcome of this appeal ...
This means that the Supreme Court has directed that the UPSC may go along with the action proposed in
its letter dated 20.3.2013 regarding conduct of review DPC for the period
1990 onwards by
a) refusing contract
service
b) strictly going by date of screening into the
grade of PEX by UPSC
c) removing those not screened from eligibility
list etc ....
The above action would be ultimately subject to any
decisons/additional directions/observations
etc that the supreme court may make during the course of the Ashraf Lone
Review DPC for the previous period i.e 1982- 1989 (before IBPS) .
Monday, April 22, 2013
PSA LIES EXPOSED !
1. Staff Artists attempt with PSA support to stay UPSC findings dismissed and declared devoid of merit by Supreme Court.
2. "PSA manipulation of facts and lies completely ignored and controverted point by point by UPSC in communication to Ministry " .
3. Supreme Court has directed UPSC go ahead with the review DPC to JTS Production of the IBPS. (See PSA misrepresentation and lies in the below given letter and The UPSC"s rebuttal)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)